Tarloven
Archive Entry — Assessment Process

Structured Process.

The Tarloven assessment methodology is a seven-stage process, each stage producing a documented output. The process applies to all service pathways: standard dietary assessment, variant system (plant-based or keto), and supplement formulation review.

7-Stage Assessment Process 90-Day Protocol Window Revision Cycle: 30d / 60d / 90d
Detailed dietary assessment worksheet pinned to a clipboard on a desk, surrounded by ingredient samples, measurement tools, and printed lab verification sheets under bright studio lighting
ARCHIVE REF: T-2026-PROC-001  |  ASSESSMENT RECORD DOCUMENTATION
── ── ── ── ── ── ── ── ── ── ── ── ── ── ── ── ── ── ── ── ──
01 — The Seven-Stage Assessment Process
01

Dietary Baseline Record

The initial stage establishes a precise dietary baseline. A structured food frequency questionnaire — spanning macronutrient distribution, meal timing patterns, gut health-relevant food frequency, and total caloric intake — is completed by the individual and reviewed against the goal profile. This forms the foundational document from which all subsequent protocol stages are derived.

The baseline record includes 17 tracked nutritional variables: total daily caloric intake, protein gram target, carbohydrate distribution, healthy fats ratio, dietary fibre quantity, omega-3 intake estimation, hydration frequency, meal timing windows, and nine micronutrient categories relevant to men's health nutrition in the 30+ cohort.

OUTPUT
  • — Dietary baseline document
  • — 17-variable nutritional record
  • — Goal profile alignment map
02

Macronutrient Ratio Modelling

Using the dietary baseline, the macronutrient allocation is modelled against the stated goal — muscle-building diet construction, body recomposition, weight loss diet for men, or sustained performance output. Carbohydrate-to-fat ratio, protein gram target, and calorie surplus or deficit band are calculated and documented.

Carbs for muscle building are assigned predominantly to the peri-workout window. Fat allocation is weighted toward omega-3 and monounsaturated sources. Protein is cross-referenced against lean body mass and distributed across 4–6 daily eating occasions based on the individual's schedule record.

OUTPUT
  • — Macronutrient ratio document
  • — Calorie target band
  • — Protein gram schedule
03

Meal Plan Construction

A structured 7-day meal plan is constructed against the macronutrient ratio model. The plan includes batch cooking sequences for meal prep for men — a schedule for preparing the week's protein and carbohydrate sources in a single or double batch session. Healthy recipes for men are indexed by macro density, preparation time, and ingredient substitutability.

The meal plan document specifies portion sizes by weight (grams), not visual estimates. An ingredient substitution index allows equivalent nutritional outcomes when specific foods are unavailable.

OUTPUT
  • — 7-day meal plan document
  • — Batch prep schedule
  • — Ingredient substitution index
04

Micronutrient Gap Analysis

The dietary record is cross-referenced against standard nutritional benchmarks for men 30+ across nine micronutrient categories: zinc, magnesium, vitamin D3, vitamin B12, selenium, iron, omega-3 (EPA/DHA combined), CoQ10, and vitamin C. Each category receives a gap rating — sufficient, marginal, or deficient — based on the food frequency record.

The gap analysis generates a whole-food correction list first. Where whole-food correction is insufficient given the individual's dietary constraints, the nutritional food-supplement formulation assessment is initiated in Stage 5. Vitamin D and zinc, magnesium for men, and omega-3 for men are the most frequently identified gap categories in the Tarloven archive.

OUTPUT
  • — Micronutrient gap record
  • — Whole-food correction list
  • — Supplement formulation trigger
05

Supplement Formulation Review

Where the micronutrient gap analysis identifies a deficient or persistently marginal category, the Tarloven supplement formulation review is conducted. Ingredient profiles within the Tarloven supplement range are selected based on published nutritional research and undergo independent batch verification for quality and labelling accuracy.

Active ingredients are sourced from documented suppliers, with each batch accompanied by a certificate of composition. Sourcing prioritises suppliers whose facilities maintain food-grade processing standards. We recommend speaking with a qualified wellness or nutrition professional before introducing any supplement to your daily routine, particularly if you have specific dietary requirements.

OUTPUT
  • — Batch verification record
  • — Certificate of composition
  • — Formulation integration note
06

Revision Cycle — 30-Day & 60-Day

The 90-day protocol window includes two structured revision cycles. At 30 days, the dietary record is reviewed against adherence data from the individual's food log. Macronutrient allocation is adjusted where significant deviation from the model is recorded. At 60 days, a secondary review updates the meal plan and recalculates the protein gram schedule based on any changes in training load or body composition trajectory.

Each revision is assigned a revision number (e.g., R01-2026, R02-2026) and archived within the individual's profile record. The revision document includes a change summary, updated target bands, and a note on any variant pathway adjustments.

OUTPUT
  • — Revision document R01
  • — Revision document R02
  • — Updated protocol record
07

90-Day Summary Archive Entry

At protocol conclusion, a summary archive entry is produced. The document consolidates the baseline record, macronutrient ratio model, meal plan, micronutrient gap analysis, supplement formulation review (if applicable), and both revision cycle records into a single reference document. The archive entry is numbered and filed in the Tarloven profile archive.

The summary archive entry serves as the foundation for any subsequent protocol engagement. It records objective indicators, dietary adherence rate, and goal profile progression status. The 94% protocol completion rate across the Tarloven archive reflects the documentation-first approach — every outcome, whether fully aligned or partially deviated, is recorded rather than discarded.

FINAL OUTPUT
  • — 90-day summary document
  • — Archive entry (numbered)
  • — Protocol extension option
02 — Sourcing Standards

Ingredient traceability. Batch documentation. Independent verification.

The sourcing methodology for Tarloven nutritional food-supplements follows a documented chain-of-custody model. Each raw material lot is received with a supplier-issued origin certificate specifying the named region of production, lot identification number, and compositional declaration.

Upon receipt, raw materials enter a quarantine record period. No material enters production without an accepted compositional review. The quarantine record is filed alongside the corresponding purchase certificate and archived at batch level.

Post-production batch verification is conducted by an independent laboratory. Results are compared against the labelled compositional declaration. Any batch producing a result outside the accepted variance range is rejected and removed from the supply chain. The certificate of composition from the independent laboratory is retained in the batch archive and available upon formal request.

Organized row of ingredient sample vials with lot number stickers on a clean lab bench under controlled white lighting, with a batch verification sheet visible in the background
ARCHIVE REF: T-2026-SRC-007  |  QUARANTINE REVIEW STAGE
100%
Batches third-party verified
LOT
Level traceability per batch
COC
Certificate of composition per batch
03 — Supplier Selection Criteria

Named-Region Origin

Each ingredient supplier is evaluated by documented origin designation. Sourcing prioritises materials from regions with established production histories for the relevant ingredient category. Region data is recorded at the lot level within the chain-of-custody archive.

Food-Grade Processing Standards

Supplier facilities are evaluated for food-grade processing standards. New suppliers are reviewed against published facility documentation before any initial material request is placed. Ongoing supplier records include an annual review cycle.

Compositional Declaration

Every raw material receipt is accompanied by a supplier-issued certificate of analysis specifying elemental composition, lot identification, and production date. This document is retained in the Tarloven sourcing archive and cross-referenced at the batch verification stage.

Quarantine & Acceptance Record

All incoming material enters a documented quarantine period. Acceptance is conditional on compositional review completion. The acceptance record specifies the reviewing specialist, date, lot number, and review outcome. Rejected lots are recorded in the archive and excluded from production.

Independent Laboratory Verification

Post-production verification is conducted at an independent laboratory. Testing parameters include elemental concentration for zinc, magnesium, D3, B12, selenium, and omega-3 (EPA/DHA) against the labelled compositional declaration and accepted variance tolerance.

ARCHIVE

Document Retention

All sourcing, quarantine, acceptance, production, and verification records are maintained in the Tarloven batch archive with revision-numbered filing. Records are available upon formal written request. Archive depth: batch TL-2022-001 through current production lot.

Request Archive Documentation
04 — Methodology Queries

Frequently documented questions on the assessment process.

The initial dietary baseline record and macronutrient ratio modelling stages are completed within the first consultation session — typically 75–90 minutes. The meal plan construction document is delivered within 5 working days of the consultation.
Both options are available. In-person sessions are conducted at the Tarloven office at 138 South Lamar Boulevard, Austin, TX 78704. Remote consultations follow the same seven-stage structure, with documentation delivered digitally in PDF format.
The distinguishing characteristic is documentation depth. Each stage produces a formal record. The macronutrient ratio model is calculated against 17 individual variables — not drawn from a generic population template. The revision cycle ensures that protocol adherence and outcome data are continuously incorporated into the record, rather than producing a static plan that becomes irrelevant within weeks.
Supplement formulation review is initiated only when the micronutrient gap analysis identifies a deficient or persistently marginal category that cannot be resolved through whole-food correction given the individual's dietary constraints. The formulation recommendation is recorded against the specific gap category, with the relevant batch verification certificate cited.
7
Assessment Stages per Protocol
17
Nutritional Variables Tracked per Baseline
3x
Revision Cycles per 90-Day Window
94%
Protocol Completion Rate, Archive-Wide
05 — Begin Assessment

Seven structured stages. A documented nutritional record, built for your profile.